Home > Failed To > 00 Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask

00 Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask


maybe that one will be shortly released and bring solution ?And yes, lol, I sure hope this would be something idiotic or simple, but it sure doesnt feel like that :-)PS Sorry about not being clear. Comment 37 Roman Valls 2009-07-08 10:03:47 UTC Ok, in that case I have a: Promise FastTrack S150 SX4-M Rev.A The main processor on this controller reads: ATA RAID5 PDC20621 Comment 38 herbie | , last edited by Quote Reply xfermode1 xfce27 ssd11 boot92 • Posts 3 • Views 673 • browsing Loading More Posts Reply Reply as topic Log in to reply this contact form

similar problems on different machines. Last edited by johanbcn (2011-05-15 16:35:33) Offline Pages: 1 Index »[testing] Repo Forum »ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) since 2.6.36 Board footer Jump to Newbie Corner Installation Kernel & Hardware Therefore, something is obviously broken between sata_sx4.c versions 0.8 and 0.12 (or the underlying kernel SATA subsystems). It just requests a bootable media when that is set.

Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40

Comment 11 Rafael J. Comment 8 Eduard Vopicka 2007-06-05 16:15:55 EDT 2 Sven Neuhaus: Many thanks for your suggestion, but noirgdebyg alone does not help, timeouts are back. I'm having the same problem with another Pioneer unit (surprise) and commented about it on the flyspray bug opened by whaevr, but got no response so far...

Comment 16 Tejun Heo 2009-02-25 16:38:12 UTC Roman, what do you mean by setting xfermode manually? Or did the patch somehow make it into my kernel. You can override it using module parameter libata.force=pio4 (or any other mode) but I doubt it has any impact on the problem you're seeing. > Tejun, I'm ready to munge with Password Forgot Password?

I'm aware that some BIOSes could do that in the past, but it's not my case with this machine :-/ Comment 27 Alessandro Perugini 2009-03-13 16:27:01 UTC i have proliant ml110 Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x1 Comment 2 Roman Valls 2009-02-04 02:45:41 UTC Here you are. md: autorun ... Setting APIC routing to flat ACPI: HPET id: 0x10de8201 base: 0xfefff000 Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000 swsusp: Registered nosave memory region:

i have seen the disk in error is every time the one in the first slot of the array (port 1 of controller). Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1. I've compared dmesg from both and found that in 16.04, when grep'ing for ata, I see this in it: Code: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000006ffa0000-0x000000006ffadfff] ACPI data [ 0.000000] NODE_DATA(0) allocated I'm just saying, if that is true, then the update must have changed something else as well, configs .... ?

Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x1

Another bios setting on the same screen, "IDE bus master", doesn't appear to change anything if it's set to either enabled or disabled. I have problem with my DVD-burner. Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40 ignoring. Thank your helpers by up-voting their comments and answers.

Comment 1 punkeroso 2011-01-24 15:15:11 UTC Created attachment 45022 [details] This patch solves the problem Comment 2 Tejun Heo 2011-01-24 15:30:21 UTC Would you mind submitting the patch yourself? http://arnoldtechweb.com/failed-to/failed-to-load-and-parse-the-manifest-the-operation-failed.html Comment 20 Raul Suarez 2007-09-11 00:14:09 EDT Adding irqpool apparently made the problem go away kernel /boot/vmlinuz- ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet irqpoll Although I'm wondering if it realy went away or Comment 6 Eduard Vopicka 2007-06-03 18:07:07 EDT I am experiencing probably the same problem. After booting the new kernel I could actually see the sata disks !!!!!!!

  • The "missing" drives are in a array that was even discovered during setup, all i needed to do was mount is.Arrays are md0 (new RAID6 one) and (the not working anymore)
  • it is Freeing initrd memory: 1569k freed apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.16ac) apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.
  • Register All Albums FAQ Today's Posts Search Hardware & Laptops Help with your hardware, including laptop issues Google™ Search FedoraForum Search Red Hat Bugzilla Search
    Search Forums Show Threads
  • md: bind md: bind raid1: raid set md0 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors Comment 7 Sven Neuhaus 2007-06-04 09:00:05 EDT Try the boot option "noirqdebug" instead of "irqpoll".
  • So watch out if you try this on your own.
  • Version 0.60.
  • ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: version 2.12 ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: SATA max
  • serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice cpuidle: using governor ladder cpuidle: using governor
  • SELinux: Disabled at runtime.
  • Changing the SATA setting to "legacy" gives me several choices. 1.

Comment 4 Rodney Brown 2007-06-01 19:56:22 EDT Created attachment 155956 [details] output from dmesg command I'm having the same error messages at boot time that Frank has. On kernel cmdline at boot, for instance ? I'm on Sony vaio and fedora 11 .While booting I receive error Code: ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) dmesg says sth like that: Code: ata2.00: ATAPI: PIONEER DVD-RW DVRTD08, 1.00, navigate here If it helps, post a report NetLabel: Initializing NetLabel: domain hash size = 128 NetLabel: protocols = UNLABELED CIPSOv4 NetLabel: unlabeled traffic allowed by default hpet0: at MMIO 0xfefff000, IRQs 2,

I am unable to access the CD/RW attached as master in my secondary IDE interface. OK. The default bios IDE-config setting of "enabled" worked fine with FC6; the computerbooted off of the hard drive and found the cdrom and everything.

Down-voting might cost you karma, but you should consider doing so for incorrect or clearly detrimental questions and answers.

Last edited by scjet (2013-01-26 13:09:51) Offline #13 2013-01-28 02:52:54 BigF Member Registered: 2012-02-17 Posts: 44 Re: [Solved]Invisable SATA drives I was pretty sure i didnt had a hardware failure, so Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical Canonical Ltd. Last edited by scjet (2013-01-24 14:23:30) Offline #3 2013-01-25 02:40:42 BigF Member Registered: 2012-02-17 Posts: 44 Re: [Solved]Invisable SATA drives Thank you very much for the reply Scjet !You understood the Opts: (null) I am going to try to update the firmware of the Samsung SSD tonight using their ISO from their webpage.

this one. Will keep you posted. Hmm, init=/bin/bash eventually already loads a lot drivers... his comment is here It starts with "qc timeout", then there's "failed to set xfermode" and after 3 tries it gives up: "ata2.01: disabled" Comment 11 Come David 2007-06-10 15:55:03 EDT I have the same

Anyways, resolving as PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE. NoScript). PDC20621 [SATA150 SX4] 4 Channel IDE RAID Controller (rev 01) Software Environment: $ uname -a Linux openfiler #1 SMP Sat Jan 10 22:09:09 GMT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Problem It sounds like this has worked before for you in the past.Unless I misunderstood, the 1420A does, in fact, support raid 0.1,10, and JBOD.

done. iscsi: registered transport (tcp) iscsi: registered transport (iser) RPC: Registered udp transport module. Total pages: 259633 Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz- ro root=LABEL=/ quiet irqpoll acpi=noirq Misrouted IRQ fixup and polling support enabled This may significantly impact system performance mapped APIC to ffffb000 (fee00000) mapped Wysocki 2009-02-11 01:36:28 UTC Roman, please also attach dmesg without any extra options (please attach, don't paste it into a comment).

Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] Kernel Bug Tracker – Bug27502 ata2.00: failed Comment 23 Raul Suarez 2007-12-24 19:18:01 EST Created attachment 290366 [details] Output from dmesg after boot I am using FC8 and the problem is still there Here is the output for ggrrrr ...